James Rachels' Death And Dying

James Rachels is one of the most controversial philosophers talked about
in today's society. One of his most talked about topics is whether a person has
a right to die or not. Not much is known about Rachels expect for the many
articles and books he has written. In the controversy of letting a person die
or killing him, he does not try to explain which method is good and which method
is bad. He however tries to explain why they both are bad to a certain degree.
Rachels does not take one side, but tries to convince why one is better than the
other. In his opinion, letting a person starve to death or just putting him out
of his misery by killing him is an ongoing struggle. If you let ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

be a moral act? What about a patient that is suffering from
cancer? Is it moral to let that person suffer? These are some of the many
questions people have been trying to answer for year without success.
Euthanasia is a very uncomfortable subject to talk about for most people
because who wants to think about having to kill oneself or a person that is dear
to his or her life. Even though nobody wants to go through the hardship of
deciding whether a person should live or die, it happens everyday. There are
two forms of euthanasia. There is an active euthanasia and a passive euthanasia
(Jussim 7-13). This so-called distinction between active and passive was
challenged by Rachels in a paper first published in 1975 in the New England
Journal of Medicine. In that paper, Rachels challenges both the use and moral
significance of that distinction. He argues that active euthanasia is in many
cases is more humane than passive euthanasia. Rachels urges doctors to
reconsider ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

if she doesn't go into surgery. However, Baby Jane Doe has a slight chance
of living if the surgery is done, but she would most likely live to be 18 years
old or less. She would still be mentally retarded and would need constant
attention from her parents. So if Baby Jane goes into surgery, it would be the
same as passive euthanasia. The parents of Baby Jane decided that it would be
better for them and her if she died peacefully rather than suffering through
what was sure to be her death in later years. However, the government decided
that it was wrong for Baby Jane to die so they were forced to have the surgery
done to their child (Rachels 60-62). So is killing someone worse than ...

Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.


James Rachels' Death And Dying. (2005, February 25). Retrieved March 17, 2018, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/James-Rachels-Death-And-Dying/22827
"James Rachels' Death And Dying." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 25 Feb. 2005. Web. 17 Mar. 2018. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/James-Rachels-Death-And-Dying/22827>
"James Rachels' Death And Dying." Essayworld.com. February 25, 2005. Accessed March 17, 2018. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/James-Rachels-Death-And-Dying/22827.
"James Rachels' Death And Dying." Essayworld.com. February 25, 2005. Accessed March 17, 2018. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/James-Rachels-Death-And-Dying/22827.
Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

Added: 2/25/2005 02:36:51 PM
Category: Health & Medicine
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 1725
Pages: 7

Save | Report


Save and find your favorite essays easier

The Death And Dying Beliefs Of ...
On Death and Dying by Elisabeth...
Death And Bereavement
Thanatology: Death and Denial
Euthanasia And Suicide
Movie: Casper - Death And Growt...
Interview And Death
Themes Of Death And Desire In
The Effects Of Setting On Chara...
Interview And Death
Copyright | Cancel | Contact Us

Copyright © 2018 Essayworld. All rights reserved