Is Joseph Conrad More Critical of Whites or Africans in Heart of Darkness?
An essay arguing that Joseph Conrad is more critical of Whites than Blacks in Heart of Darkness
To the vast majority of Europeans of the 19th century, colonization was a noble cause that brought civilization, Christianity and culture to underdeveloped civilizations. Many Europeans believed that they were welcomed abroad and were improving societies in the name of God. Far ahead of his time, Joseph Conrad saw the hypocrisy with this thinking. In his novella Heart of Darkness Conrad is much more critical of the European characters than the native African characters. Conrad shows this in four different ways. First, he shows he is more critical of the Europeans than the Africans by ...
Want to read the rest of this paper? Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay and over 50,000 other term papers
|
is more critical of Europeans than Africans in his novella is because of how Conrad negatively portrays the European Pilgrims and praises the African Cannibals by depicting the Pilgrims as evil, ruthless and cruel aggressors who terrorize the Cannibals and Africans. An example of this is when Marlow, the Pilgrims and the Cannibals are ambushed by a group of Africans who attack them possibly on Kurtz's behalf or because they want to protect Kurtz. Using their superior weaponry, the Pilgrims inflict great casualties on the Africans, which lead one Pilgrim to say � Say! We must have made a glorious slaughter of them in the bush. Eh?� (87). This is ironic because the Europeans of Marlow�s time most likely saw Africans are a warlike, savage people. However, Conrad shows that it is the European pilgrims carrying out and celebrating a massacre, which proves they are acting more warlike and more like barbarians than the Africans. The Pilgrims also show their cruelty when they make sure ...
Get instant access to over 50,000 essays. Write better papers. Get better grades.
Already a member? Login
|
Kurtz's apparent mistress, and uses the following paragraph to describe her:
"She walked with measured steps, draped in striped and fringed cloths, treading the earth proudly, with a slight jingle and flash of barbarous ornaments. She carried her head high; her hair was done in the shape of a helmet; she had brass leggings to the knee, brass wire gauntlets to the elbow, a crimson spot on her tawny cheek, innumerable necklaces of glass beads on her neck; bizarre things, charms, gifts of witch-men, that hung about her, glittered and trembled at every step. She must have had the value of several elephant tusks upon her. She was savage and superb, wild-eyed and magnificent; there was ...
Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library. Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports, and research papers in 2 minutes or less.
|
CITE THIS PAGE:
Is Joseph Conrad More Critical of Whites or Africans in Heart of Darkness?. (2012, August 31). Retrieved June 2, 2025, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Joseph-Conrad-More-Critical-Whites-Africans/101403
"Is Joseph Conrad More Critical of Whites or Africans in Heart of Darkness?." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 31 Aug. 2012. Web. 2 Jun. 2025. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Joseph-Conrad-More-Critical-Whites-Africans/101403>
"Is Joseph Conrad More Critical of Whites or Africans in Heart of Darkness?." Essayworld.com. August 31, 2012. Accessed June 2, 2025. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Joseph-Conrad-More-Critical-Whites-Africans/101403.
"Is Joseph Conrad More Critical of Whites or Africans in Heart of Darkness?." Essayworld.com. August 31, 2012. Accessed June 2, 2025. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Joseph-Conrad-More-Critical-Whites-Africans/101403.
|