Marrying Homosexuals

This paper received an "A" Homosexuals should be allowed to marry because the disallowance of it violates their constitutional rights. Marriage is an institution long recognized by our government under the right to pursue happiness, and denying that right to any couple, regardless of gender, is unconstitutional. This argument, though, is not disputed. In fact, none of the arguments raised in opposition to the allowance of homosexual marriages takes into account the constitutional rights afforded to all humans. The arguments are only in relation to the possible repercussions (real or imagined) of granting these rights. Our nation was built and has always been based on the fundamental ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

v. Virginia, the Supreme Court said, “The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.” In the case of Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, the Supreme Court said, “This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” At this time, however, marriage is only granted to heterosexual couples. Although homosexuals live under the same constitution, they are not afforded the same rights as heterosexuals. The reasons presented against the allowance of homosexual marriage are flimsy, and have nothing to do with the constitutional rights that are supposed to be afforded every American. All of the arguments against homosexual marriages have to do with the repercussions of granting the constitutional right of marriage to homosexuals, but not with the ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

the Church to be a covenant with God, the popular view in the Church is that homosexual marriages can not be allowed. There are a couple of problems with this. First, constitutional law can not be determined by religious grounds. The 1st amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” Second, the Church will not be forced to acknowledge homosexual marriages even if they are condoned by the State. The same amendment that keeps religious grounds from determining law is the amendment that will allow the Church to continue denying homosexual marriages once they are allowed by the state. Third, homosexuals will ...

Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.


Marrying Homosexuals. (2004, March 17). Retrieved December 12, 2018, from
"Marrying Homosexuals.", 17 Mar. 2004. Web. 12 Dec. 2018. <>
"Marrying Homosexuals." March 17, 2004. Accessed December 12, 2018.
"Marrying Homosexuals." March 17, 2004. Accessed December 12, 2018.
Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

Added: 3/17/2004 07:07:06 PM
Category: Political Science
Type: Free Paper
Words: 2083
Pages: 8

Save | Report


Save and find your favorite essays easier

» Sexual Themes In The Birdcage
» Sex Marriage
» The Birdcage
» A Non-Religious Contract In Ame...
» Adversity And Resilience Of Hom...
» "I Do" Or "Please Don't": Hawai...
» Acceptance Of Homosexual Marri
» Homosexuals: A Suspect Class?
» Homosexual Marriage
» Gay Marriage
Copyright | Cancel | Contact Us

Copyright © 2018 Essayworld. All rights reserved