Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
Nuclear Fission - Online Papers

Nuclear Fission

Would you prefer electricity generation via nuclear fission or coal combustion?
With the increased concern about global warming amongst modern society, I think most people would agree that the use of coal to generate electricity is not sustainable in the long term. Nuclear energy, at the moment, represents our only real large-scale alternative to generating electricity.
However the only barrier to Australia adopting nuclear power generation is a political barrier. Despite Australia having the world's largest reserves of Uranium, we are also one of the worlds largest exporters of coal. As a result, the coal industry has a huge lobbying influence on both sides of politics, and the ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

geothermal heat underground - and the only waste produced is water, meaning that it would be a truly carbon neutral and waste neutral source of power.

Post position: Reply - 2th in thread

Purpose: to discuss whether future electricity should be mainly generated by nuclear fission or coal combustion

Part Two:

The reason why I choose this threat as my blog is that in my opinion, it is important to consider and identify which current source of electricity generation should be eliminate or enhanced in future. In this thread, it is talking about the comparison between nuclear fission and coal combustion and the author tend to agree the usage of nuclear fission as the main source of electricity generation in future instead of coal combustion. Both of them are recently controversial issue as to many areas such as environment, politics and economy.
In my opinion, I totally agree with the point from Scott. I think active in use of nuclear fission could obviously eliminate ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

CITE THIS PAGE:

APA
MLA
Chicago
Turabian

Nuclear Fission. (2011, March 26). Retrieved April 25, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Nuclear-Fission/96846

"Nuclear Fission." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 26 Mar. 2011. Web. 25 Apr. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Nuclear-Fission/96846>

"Nuclear Fission." Essayworld.com. March 26, 2011. Accessed April 25, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Nuclear-Fission/96846.

JOIN NOW

Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

PAPER DETAILS

Added: 3/26/2011 08:58:26 PM
Submitted By: tengsaaron
Category: Environment
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 485
Pages: 2

Save |

Report

SHARE THIS PAPER

SAVED ESSAYS

Save and find your favorite essays easier