Opponent Proponent
There has always been and will always be disagreement and thus there will also always be opponents. While opposition normally seems to have a negative connotation, without it there would be no room for improvement or change. Opposition is so important in fact that the right to oppose is part of the First Amendment of our Constitution. Freedom of speech is vital in a healthy and productive country, and for those in which it is limited, there is often much strife and more dangerous forms of disagreement. The same is true between different countries, schools, families, and really any aspect of life. The key is to try and find a way to deal with discrepancies in a calm and productive matter, ...
Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers
|
from the point of view of “agonistic pluralism”, the aim of democratic politics is to construct the “them” in such a way that it is no longer perceived as an enemy to be destroyed, but an “adversary”, i.e. somebody whose ideas we combat but whose right to defend those ideas we do not put into question.” (Page 15) Here she is discussing the idea of converting antagonism into agonism and therefore viewing our opponents as adversaries instead of enemies. In Mouffe’s writings she makes her point very apparent, that there must always be opposition and that the aim of democracy should not be to reach rational consensus. Mouffe’s goal is disagreement without violence, a never-ending process. I agree with her in this area because while it is natural to wish for concurrence among everyone, it is impossible. Friction is necessary in a functioning society. As I stated earlier, we are human and are not going to agree on everything. Also, in order to maintain freedom of speech and ...
Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.
Already a member? Login
|
Before you try and push a strong belief on someone or to dismiss your opponent’s views, make sure to learn all the facts and create the most rational position that is possible. Even after having separate, well put together positions, there are multiple possibilities for results involving one or more opponents being right, partially correct, or wrong. No matter the result, arguing is ultimately beneficial because both sides have had their say and hopefully learned something. While this sounds wonderful it is obviously and unfortunately not always this simple.
A line has to be drawn of when to respect a person’s beliefs and when those beliefs are distasteful, irrational, or dangerous. ...
Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.
|
CITE THIS PAGE:
Opponent Proponent. (2011, April 14). Retrieved April 29, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Opponent-Proponent/98034
"Opponent Proponent." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 14 Apr. 2011. Web. 29 Apr. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Opponent-Proponent/98034>
"Opponent Proponent." Essayworld.com. April 14, 2011. Accessed April 29, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Opponent-Proponent/98034.
"Opponent Proponent." Essayworld.com. April 14, 2011. Accessed April 29, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Opponent-Proponent/98034.
|
Save
Report