Click Vs Brick: An Exploration Of Mp3 File Sharing And Onlin

An exploration of mp3 file sharing and online music piracy, and its ethical implications regarding consumers, musicians, and record companies
“In traditional ethical studies, the classic problem is the starving man – can a starving man ethically steal a loaf of bread if he has no money. The modern version is evidently, can the person who wants to listen to music steal it if he thinks the price is too high?”
The topical escalation of media coverage besieging the demise of Napster has instigated widespread debate over the implications file sharing and the Internet will have for the record industry. The Napster software allowed its millions of users to share and download music mp3 files, ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

access to copyrighted music.
There are numerous arguments originating from all sides of the debate. Many of these are mutually exclusive and, therefore, cannot all be substantiated. McDougall (2000) published an article online, in which he summates the main arguments listed below:

• Copying is fair use
• Copying is theft
• Music wants to be free
• Napster users buy more CDs
• Music companies make too much money
• Music companies will make more money with Internet distribution
• Musicians can’t make money with Internet distribution
• Musicians will make more money with Internet distribution

Within the context of a report, the following discussion will evaluate these key points from the perspective of the consumers, musicians, and record companies.

The Consumers’ Perspective
There are two fundamental arguments that endeavour to justify online music piracy from the consumers’ perspective. The first is that copying is fair use. Many believe that subsequent to buying a ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

RIAA and the major labels have attempted to lock up our culture and heritage through extensive lobbying, outrageous campaign donations, misleading our political leaders and lying to the public, while misrepresenting the facts.”

This suggests that consumers have the right to download music for free, as the practices of the major labels and industry bodies such as the RIAA are questionable. This is irrelevant as stealing intellectual property is still stealing, despite the substantiation of a physical product. “Piracy is theft. It is the reproduction of someone’s copyright without their approval and generally on a commercial scale.” The International Federation of the Phonographic ...

Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.


Click Vs Brick: An Exploration Of Mp3 File Sharing And Onlin. (2004, March 9). Retrieved October 22, 2021, from
"Click Vs Brick: An Exploration Of Mp3 File Sharing And Onlin.", 9 Mar. 2004. Web. 22 Oct. 2021. <>
"Click Vs Brick: An Exploration Of Mp3 File Sharing And Onlin." March 9, 2004. Accessed October 22, 2021.
"Click Vs Brick: An Exploration Of Mp3 File Sharing And Onlin." March 9, 2004. Accessed October 22, 2021.
Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

Added: 3/9/2004 04:24:34 PM
Category: American History
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 3826
Pages: 14

Save | Report


Save and find your favorite essays easier

» Click Vs. Brick: An Exploration...
» An Exploration Of Femininity I
» An Exploration Of Femininity I
» History of the Media, Radio, an...
» An Act of Vengence
» Native Sun: Society's Responsib...
» Wuthering Heights Contrasting W...
» An Analysis Of Heart Of Darkne
» Possible Origins Of The Vampire...
» An Analysis Of The Cask Of Ama
Copyright | Cancel | Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 Essayworld. All rights reserved