Cosmetic Testing On Animals
When most people go to the store to purchase cosmetics and household cleaners they usually don’t put too much thought into it. Most people do not realize that 14 million animals die and suffer each year for these products that are almost meaningless to humans. (Shah, abstract) Cosmetic animal testing is a very big problem that gets greatly overlooked. It is a problem that has lasted for centuries. As a matter of fact, according to the All for Animals Newsletter, animal testing on cosmetics goes way back to the seventeenth century when animals were believed to feel no pain. After it was proven that they could feel pain the testing stopped for a while. However, it began again in 1933 when a ...
Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers
|
the results.(All for Animals Newsletter, Issue 1) This test is usually preformed on albino rabbits, and it is done by clipping their eyes back. The painful results of this test include swelling of the eyelids, inflammation of the iris, ulceration, bleeding, blindness, and death resulting from broken necks.(the animal breaks their neck in an attempt to get free). The LD50 or Lethal Dose 50 is preformed by force-feeding a substance to a group of animals until fifty percent of them dies. Substances may also be pumped into the animals stomach, injected under the skin, into a vein, or into the lining of the abdomen. This test, as well as the Draize test, is preformed without administering no kind of painkillers.(Shah, abstract) Many health professionals agree that these tests are crude and imprecise. (Shah, abstract) However, many scientist agree that these tests are vital in obtaining scientific test results that are reliable and accurate.(Health safety alliance, abstract)
No matter ...
Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.
Already a member? Login
|
human cells that are used to compute the absorption of a water-soluble dye to measure relative toxicity.
Testskin: Human skin grown in plastic bags is used to test irritancy.
Topkat: computer software program that measures toxicity, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and teratonogenicity.
So with all of these alternatives that are more cost effective, better predictors of human injury, provide quicker results, and don’t hurt animals: Why don’t all companies use them? The answer is that they have a fear for human safety and they fear product liability suits.
There are no laws that say cosmetics have to be tested on animals nor is there one that says that they can’t be tested. However, ...
Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.
|
CITE THIS PAGE:
Cosmetic Testing On Animals. (2007, June 21). Retrieved April 26, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Cosmetic-Testing-On-Animals/66786
"Cosmetic Testing On Animals." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 21 Jun. 2007. Web. 26 Apr. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Cosmetic-Testing-On-Animals/66786>
"Cosmetic Testing On Animals." Essayworld.com. June 21, 2007. Accessed April 26, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Cosmetic-Testing-On-Animals/66786.
"Cosmetic Testing On Animals." Essayworld.com. June 21, 2007. Accessed April 26, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Cosmetic-Testing-On-Animals/66786.
|
Save
Report