The Case Against Affirmative Action

The Case Against Affirmative Action

Louis P. Pojman

In this essay I set forth nine arguments against Strong Affirmative Action, which I define as preferential treatment, discriminating in favor of members of under-represented groups, which have been treated unjustly in the past, against innocent people. I distinguish this from Weak Affirmative Action, which simply seeks to promote equal opportunity to the goods and offices of a society. I do not argue against this policy. I argue against Strong Affirmative Action, attempting to show that two wrongs don't make a right. This form of Affirmative Action, as it is applied against White males, is both racist and sexist.

Hardly a week ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

end it") and the Republicans opposing it ("affirmative action is reverse racism"). During the last general election (November 7, 1996) California voters by a 55% to 45% vote approved Proposition 209 (called the "California Civil Rights Initiative") which made it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race or gender, hence ending Affirmative Action in public institutions in California. The Supreme Court recently refused to rule on the appeal, thus leaving it to the individual states to decide how they will deal with this issue. Both sides have reorganized for a renewed battle. At the same time, the European Union's High Court of Justice in Luxembourg has recently approved Affirmative Action programs giving women preferential treatment in the 15 European Union countries (Nov. 11, 1997).

Let us agree that despite the evidences of a booming economy, the poor are suffering grievously, with children being born into desperate material and psychological poverty, for whom the ideal of ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

of those slaves, some of whom may now enjoy high incomes and social status, have a right to opportunities and offices over better qualified Whites who had nothing to do with either slavery or the oppression of Blacks, and who may even have suffered hardship comparable to that of poor Blacks. In addition, Strong Affirmative Action creates a new Hierarchy of the Oppressed: Blacks get primary preferential treatment, women second, Native Americans third, Hispanics fourth, Handicapped fifth, and Asians sixth and so on until White males, no matter how needy or well qualified, must accept the left-overs. Naturally, combinations of oppressed classes (e.g., a one eyed, Black Hispanic ...

Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.


The Case Against Affirmative Action. (2011, May 16). Retrieved March 18, 2019, from
"The Case Against Affirmative Action.", 16 May. 2011. Web. 18 Mar. 2019. <>
"The Case Against Affirmative Action." May 16, 2011. Accessed March 18, 2019.
"The Case Against Affirmative Action." May 16, 2011. Accessed March 18, 2019.
Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

Added: 5/16/2011 11:30:32 AM
Submitted By: marcomme
Category: Social Issues
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 9862
Pages: 36

Save | Report


Save and find your favorite essays easier

The Problem With Affirmative Ac...
Affirmative Action And Its Eff
How Affirmative Action Effects
The Problems Of Affirmative Act...
The History Of Affirmative Acti...
Moral Basis for Affirmative Act...
Affirmative Action Policies
Garrett Hardin In "Lifeboat Et...
Analysis Of Rich And Poor And T...
Hardin's "Lifeboat Ethics: The ...
Copyright | Cancel | Contact Us

Copyright © 2019 Essayworld. All rights reserved