Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
United States of America V. Deppe - Research Papers

United States of America V. Deppe

Jeriesha Callaway
March 26, 2012
Law 11
Belief Case Pg 126

* Case Name: Internet Fraud
United States of America V. Deppe
509 F.3d 54
U.S. Court of Appeals
2007

* Key Facts:

* Michael R. Deppe, 21 year old, offered Rolex watches for sale over the internet in exchange for funds wire transferred directly to his bank account.

* 27 transactions and approximately 115,000 in payments. One hitch: Deppe did not send a single customer a watch.

* Deppe and another person offered to sell over the internet nonexistent tickets to the Super Bowl nearly 263.000 for tickets that Deppe and his business partner did not possess.

* Federal grand jury indicted Deppe of wire fraud and ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

Whether or not fairly attributed to Barnum appears to be as insightful in cyber-commerce in face-to-face business transactions.

* The District Court concluded "The defendant did not truthfully admit the conduct of the offensive conviction and did not truthfully admit and has falsely denied other relevant conduct"

* Appellant's failure to accept full responsibility.

* Logical explanation for the 7-7 month's sentence.

6. Conclusion: The U.S. court of Appeals held that defendant Deppe did not deserve a sentence reduction. The court of Appeals upheld the District courts sentencing of Deppe to seventy- eight months in prison.

7. Our View: My opinion towards the case is why the U.S. court of Appeals denied Deppe reduction towards his own time? I hope the courts charged his other business partner that participated in the Super Bowl tickets too. I liked how Deppe man up to his own consequences and how he wants to take full charge for it, so I think the courts should ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.


Already a member? Login


CITE THIS PAGE:

United States of America V. Deppe. (2012, October 8). Retrieved March 29, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/United-States-of-America-V-Deppe/101620
"United States of America V. Deppe." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 8 Oct. 2012. Web. 29 Mar. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/United-States-of-America-V-Deppe/101620>
"United States of America V. Deppe." Essayworld.com. October 8, 2012. Accessed March 29, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/United-States-of-America-V-Deppe/101620.
"United States of America V. Deppe." Essayworld.com. October 8, 2012. Accessed March 29, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/United-States-of-America-V-Deppe/101620.
JOIN NOW
Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays


PAPER DETAILS
Added: 10/8/2012 12:22:55 PM
Submitted By: jeriesha33
Category: Legal Issues
Type: Free Paper
Words: 345
Pages: 2

Save | Report

SHARE THIS PAPER

SAVED ESSAYS
Save and find your favorite essays easier

SIMILAR ESSAYS
» Evolution and Natural Selection
» Holocaust Impact On History
» Comparing The Sermon On The Mou...
» Fallacy Of Personal Attack
» The Importance Of Being Earnes
» Hills Like White Elephants 2
» Pakistan
» Alcoholism 3
» Date Rape
» Otherization in the "Tempest" b...
Copyright | Cancel | Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Essayworld. All rights reserved